Ticket #320 (closed defect: wontfix)

Opened 8 years ago

Last modified 8 years ago

"<license>" in Work section of rdf metadata

Reported by: mura Owned by: brent
Priority: major Milestone: 2.2.0
Component: ContentLicensing Version: Seattle 2.2.0-rc2
Keywords: Cc:

Description

Is the use:

<license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/"/>

Really correct in the work section?

Seems as if it should have a different syntax (though I haven't checked this)

<dc:license> "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/" </dc:license>

Change History

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by dray

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to invalid

The RDF metadata expresses License information per the Creative Commons RDF metadata spc.

http://creativecommons.org/technology/licenseoutput

There is *no* dc:license field:

http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by mura

  • Status changed from closed to reopened
  • Resolution invalid deleted

Ah, but it is a refinement of the term rights...Dublin Core says refinements don't show hierarchically, but at the same levelish.

http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#H3

You'll have to scroll down to find dc:license, but it's there. The element set doesn't define it, but it is a valid term and the extension of the syntax would be to use the syntax I suggested. Or ask DC how they would do it.

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by dray

  • Component changed from General to ContentLicensing

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by jon

  • Status changed from reopened to closed
  • Resolution set to wontfix
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.